Independent Study gives families the flexibility that traditional classrooms can’t match. But that flexibility comes with specific administrative and compliance requirements that differ significantly from classroom-based instruction.
Charter schools already operate within layers of district, state, and federal requirements. Add ongoing legislative updates (such as California’s AB 130), and the landscape keeps shifting. That’s why understanding the differences between IS and classroom instruction matters. It helps you design programs that deliver strong outcomes.
As a charter school leader, understanding these differences helps you design the best possible learning outcomes across various delivery settings while building systems that are flexible, thorough, and easy to adapt when regulations change. In this post, we’ll walk through the key administrative distinctions between IS and classroom instruction and show you how strategic planning and dynamic recordkeeping make compliance manageable.
Note that regulations continue to evolve. Always consult with your legal counsel, auditor, or compliance advisor to ensure your programs meet current requirements.
What Qualifies as Independent Study vs Traditional Classroom Instruction
What is Independent Study? How is it distinguished for administrative and compliance purposes from classroom instruction? As flexible learning models grow more popular, the distinction between them isn’t always clear. The California Department of Education (CDE) provides specific definitions that matter for compliance.
Classroom-Based Instruction
Classroom-based instruction is the traditional model most people picture when they think of a brick-and-mortar school. It is defined by its educational delivery models, schedule structure, attendance model, and progress measurement.
- Educational Delivery: Instruction is teacher-led and happens in a school setting. At least 80% of instructional time takes place in a physical classroom, according to the CDE.
- Schedule Structure: The school day drives the schedule. Models for scheduling may vary (i.e., block schedules). However, the overall flow of course content is built into the class administratively.
- Attendance: Students are considered in attendance when they are physically in the classroom.
- Progress Measurements: Educators may use a variety of progress measurements, including in-class activities, homework assignments, quizzes, tests, and projects, to gauge learning.
Independent Study
The CDE allows Independent Study as an alternative to classroom instruction, with one critical requirement: IS students must meet the same course requirements as students in regular classes. The primary difference lies in delivery methods, which create distinct administrative considerations.
- Educational Delivery: Students spend more than 20% of their time outside of a traditional classroom. Materials are often delivered without direct teacher instruction, and students can access them independently.
- Schedule Structure: IS typically operates on a flexible schedule. Much of the work happens asynchronously, and students often complete assignments at their own pace rather than during set class times.
- Attendance: Instead of seat time, attendance is measured through the time value of student work. This metric is determined by the certificated teacher overseeing the instruction.
- Progress Measurements: While progress measurements may look similar to in-person instruction, the documentation requirements are more specific to meet regulatory standards.

Key Differences in Administration and Compliance
There are key differences at each stage of the educational process.
Enrollment Process
While enrollment may look similar at first glance, IS requires a legally binding agreement that fundamentally changes the process.
Traditional, Classroom
In traditional classroom settings, the enrollment process follows a familiar pattern. Families complete enrollment forms, schools collect required information and conduct fair and equitable lottery draws when necessary, and students are assigned to classrooms with a teacher of record who manages instruction and assessment.
From an administrative standpoint, this model relies on established systems and workflows.
Independent Study
Instead of traditional enrollment and registration paperwork, IS requires a written agreement before instruction begins. The Learning or Master Agreement is the governing document for the instructional relationship, and requires signatures from:
- Student (at any age)
- Parent/guardian (for students under 18)
- Supervising certificated teacher
- Special education staff (if applicable)
Typically, these signatures are required before any instruction can begin. There is an exception for short-term IS (15 days or fewer), but even then, completing the Agreement before instruction starts is best practice.
Every Independent Study Agreement or Master Agreement must include:
- How, when, where, and how often student submits work and receive feedback
- Specific resources provided, including mandatory connectivity and devices
- Maximum time between assignments by grade level
- Number of missed assignments that trigger evaluation
- Definition of satisfactory educational progress
- Individualized supports for: English learners, students not at grade level, students with IEPs/504 plans, foster youth, students experiencing homelessness, students needing mental health support
- Statement that participation is optional (students cannot be required to participate)
- Duration with specific start and end dates
- Course credits or other measures of academic accomplishment
How Planning Is Impacted
Since the Agreement must be signed before instruction begins, it also needs to be completely planned and clearly written before collecting signatures. This requires significant administrative capacity:
- Front-load Agreements with E-Signatures: Coordinating signatures between multiple stakeholders is more complex than it seems. Electronic systems with digital signature capabilities make this more manageable.
- Build in Quality Checks: The supervising teacher needs to ensure students meet the same outcomes as classroom instruction. This requires robust, meaningful, and well-documented quality checks to be built into the initial Agreement. Building these into the initial Agreement keeps expectations clear and helps make positive student outcomes.
- Individualize Each Agreement: IS exists to provide instruction outside typical methods, which means participating students often have unique needs. A professional athlete may have a modified schedule that allows them to complete their work around their schedules. A student with an autoimmune disorder may have a reduced workload during flare-ups. There’s no one-size-fits-all boilerplate; each agreement needs to be tailored to the individual student.
- Create Stopgaps for Preventing Premature Instruction: Administrative errors like missing signatures, unclear time-value claims, and inaccurate ADA claims often stem from rushed or unclear processes. Rather than reacting to mistakes, build a system that automatically prevents them from occurring.
Attendance and Participation Tracking
Educational programs only succeed when students show up and engage. Schools still need to track attendance and participation, but what that looks like differs across program types.
Traditional, Classroom
In traditional classrooms, attendance is based on physical presence, and these counts drive Average Daily Attendance (ADA) records. This data set is observable across all classrooms, and teachers manage rosters for entire classes at once, especially when integrated into an effective Student Information System.
Independent Study
Instead of counting physical presence, schools use “time value,” which estimates how long it would reasonably take a student to complete submitted work in Independent Study.
Under SB 153/AB 176, documentation must include hours or a fraction of hours of both work products and asynchronous instruction time before converting to ADA. The formula looks like this:
Time value of work products + asynchronous instruction time + synchronous instruction participation
This process is subjective and requires considerable effort on the part of the certificated teacher to personally assess the “time value” of each student’s work to make an attendance claim. Unlike classroom attendance, this calculation cannot be automated or delegated to non-certificated staff. Since this documentation must be contemporaneous and can’t be added retroactively, be sure to integrate it into your regular daily and weekly practices.
SB 153/AB 176 requires schools to separately document hours (or fractions of hours) spent in three distinct categories:
- Asynchronous instruction time (even without tangible work products, if computer program documents participation)
- Work product completion time
- Synchronous instruction participation
Schools must separately document hours (or fractions of hours) spent in:
- Contemporaneous records (created at the time, not recreated later)
- Daily engagement logs showing which school days students worked
- Time value determinations before converting hours to ADA
- Evidence of synchronous instruction participation
How Planning Is Impacted
IS requires evaluating and documenting learning individually for ADA purposes every day. The key is to treat documentation as an extension of instruction rather than a separate compliance task.
- Build in Daily Documentation: Make documentation part of the teacher’s daily workflow so it supports instruction instead of competing with it.
- Create Clear Protocols: While IS work is individualized, widely applicable protocols allow teachers to enter information consistently.
- Keep Clear Records: Make sure your records are set up to capture when and how teachers evaluate work.
- Match Staffing to Enrollment: IS programs require certificated staff, so make sure staffing meets enrollment needs.
Instructional Time and Live Interaction
Classroom teachers see their students daily, creating opportunities to spot struggle and intervene in the moment. IS reduces daily observation, which is why the law requires structured check-ins and proactive intervention systems. These systems must be operational, not just written into policy.
Traditional Classroom
In traditional classrooms, instructional minutes follow the bell schedule, and daily observation helps teachers identify when students struggle. Intervention typically follows school or district protocols, often activating after multiple absences.
Independent Study
In an IS setting, structured synchronous instruction varies by grade level. TK-3 students have daily opportunities for synchronous instruction. Grades 4-8 receive weekly synchronous instruction alongside daily live interaction. Grades 9-12 receive weekly synchronous instruction opportunities.
IS changes how teachers observe students. Instead of continuous in-person monitoring, they rely on scheduled check-ins and reviewing student work. That’s why the law requires minimum amounts of synchronous instruction and live interaction, with non-participation triggering tiered intervention. (Note: Short-term IS under 16 days and medical treatment situations are exempted.)
Intervention in these cases must be proactive. There is a structured response before students fall behind.
Synchronous instruction is live, two-way teaching between a certificated teacher and student(s). It includes classroom-style instruction or small group/one-on-one sessions delivered in-person, via video call, or by phone. This is actual teaching time focused on content delivery and learning, not just check-ins or progress monitoring.
Live interaction is real-time communication between students and school staff (or peers) that keeps students connected to the school community. Required daily for grades 4-8 in Independent Study, it includes wellness checks, progress monitoring, service delivery, instruction, or peer interaction. It can be provided by certificated or classified staff, making it broader and more flexible than synchronous instruction.
Tiered re-engagement is a structured, four-step intervention process required when IS students hit any of three specific triggers:
- Not generating attendance for more than 10% of instructional time over 4 continuous weeks
- Missing more than 50% of synchronous instruction opportunities in a school month
- Violating the written Independent Study agreement
Unlike traditional classroom truancy protocols that respond after prolonged absences, tiered re-engagement requires proactive intervention at these specific thresholds.
Tiered re-engagement must include:
- Verification of current contact information for all enrolled students
- Same-day notification to parents/guardians when student doesn’t participate
- Outreach plan to determine student needs (connecting with health/social services as needed)
- Pupil-parent-educator conference to review agreement and determine if IS remains appropriate
How Planning Is Impacted
Tracking participation and implementing effective proactive intervention requires preparation:
- Track Participation in Real Time: If a student misses several participation opportunities, they can quickly fall weeks behind. Real-time tracking helps identify these gaps immediately, so timely interventions can happen as soon as they’re needed.
- Create Communication Templates: When students miss a participation opportunity, fail to submit work, or demonstrate a lack of understanding of materials, notifications can nudge them back on track. Having clear communication templates makes sending notifications less administratively taxing and ensures consistency.
- Document Re-Engagement Steps: The CDE requires a four-step re-engagement process. Built-in documentation at each step ensures compliance while also providing all stakeholders with the necessary information to participate successfully.
- Assign Intervention Responsibilities Clearly: When it’s unclear who owns a particular re-engagement step, students can slip through the cracks. Make sure every intervention task has a clearly assigned owner, and the communication process for starting and completing each step is well-documented and accessible.

Recordkeeping and Audit Readiness
Classroom instruction generates straightforward records for attendance and educational achievement. IS programs require a more comprehensive and proactive documentation system that includes thirteen distinct categories auditors need to verify. Missing or incomplete records can result in loss of ADA funding.
Traditional Classroom
In a traditional classroom, day-to-day interactions generate a range of records, including rosters, gradebooks, assessments, and lesson plans. Together, these documents provide both big-picture and granular views of classroom activity in ways that align with established audit expectations.
Independent Study
In IS situations, compliance is demonstrated through many specific, structured documents. The Master Agreement is the central governing document and must be in place and signed before IS begins. The certificated supervising teacher will use submitted work to verify instructional time, and work samples will need to be collected to prove assignment completion.
IS students have attendance logs that show completed work, participation in synchronous learning opportunities, and teacher-verified ADA claims. Any contact with students and parents/guardians, as well as any supports put in place for engagement or missing work, requires its own documentation.
All supporting documents must be maintained to create an audit trail that’s compliant and consistent across sites and staff.
The biggest mistake is creating records retroactively for audits. “Contemporaneous” means records must be created at the time the activity occurs. In IS, you cannot recreate time value determinations, engagement logs, or participation records after the fact. Auditors can identify backdated documentation, resulting in disallowed ADA claims.
Creating records retroactively for audits.
How Planning Is Impacted
IS records need to be complete, accurate, consistent, and timely to meet audit requirements. Systems and oversight, not just individual effort, protect audit outcomes.
- Create Real-Time Records: Records created in real-time, rather than retroactively, ensure thoroughness, accuracy, and consistency.
- Centralize Documentation: Work samples, attendance, and Master Agreements should be stored in a secure, centralized system. This protects against loss and ensures consistency during staffing transitions.
- Conduct Regular Internal Audits: Regular internal audits help you catch and fix compliance issues before external audits happen.
- Align Policy with Daily Practice: Above all, your systems should facilitate daily practices that incorporate compliant documentation as a natural part of daily practice rather than an extra burden.
Charter School Success With Independent Study and Classroom Models
As a charter school leader, you’re balancing the freedom to meet students where they are with compliance requirements and outcome expectations. Set yourself, your students, and your staff up for success with proactive strategies designed to make Independent Study program management a part of daily practice.
With the right tools in place, many charter schools successfully operate a combination of traditional and IS instructional models. They can do so because they’ve invested in the infrastructure, staffing capacity, and systems these programs require.
If you’re ready to see how School Pathways can set your school up for success across multiple approaches and instructional models, chat with us today.



